Imagine a college basketball world without a shot clock, three-pointers, or even dunks. That was the reality in 1967, a time when the sport was on the cusp of revolution. But here's where it gets controversial: while UCLA’s dominance was undeniable, the shadows of racial tensions and questionable influences loomed large, shaping the legacy of this iconic era. Let’s dive into the story of the 1967 NCAA Championship Game, a contest that wasn’t just about basketball—it was about change, both on and off the court.
In the mid-1960s, college basketball was a different beast. Integration was still a work in progress, particularly in the South, and the game itself lacked many of the elements we take for granted today. UCLA, however, was a force to be reckoned with. After winning back-to-back titles in 1964 and 1965, they briefly ceded the throne in 1966 to Texas Western. But the real story was brewing behind the scenes. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, then known as Lew Alcindor, had arrived as a freshman in 1965-66. Though freshmen were ineligible to play varsity at the time, Alcindor’s talent was undeniable—his freshman team handily defeated the varsity squad in a preseason exhibition. And this is the part most people miss: if Alcindor had been eligible in 1966, UCLA likely would have reclaimed the title that year.
By 1967, there was no doubt who the favorite was. UCLA entered the tournament undefeated, with Alcindor—now a sophomore—leading the charge. His presence elevated the team to an entirely new level, and their fast-paced, dynamic style of play was lightyears ahead of their competitors. After dispatching Houston in the semifinals, they faced Dayton in the finals. Despite Dayton’s gritty performance, UCLA secured a 79-64 victory, cementing their return to the top.
The game itself was a showcase of UCLA’s dominance. When the score reached 17-4, the announcer remarked, ‘It looks like the beginning of the end.’ Alcindor’s impact was undeniable, and head coach John Wooden was the architect of this revolution. Wooden brought a tradition of fast-paced basketball to Los Angeles, and in 1967, he forever changed the college game. But Wooden’s legacy isn’t without its complexities.
Here’s where it gets murky: While Wooden was known for his moral uprightness, he turned a blind eye to the growing influence of Sam Gilbert, a controversial booster with alleged ties to organized crime. Gilbert’s involvement became so pervasive that Wooden’s successor, Gene Bartow, later wrote to the NCAA, thanking them for not investigating UCLA. Bartow claimed he feared for his life, believing Gilbert might have Mafia connections. While Bartow later dismissed this as a joke, the question remains: Was it truly a laughing matter? What do you think?
On a different note, watching this game today—58 years later—offers a jarring reminder of the era’s racial dynamics. Hearing the announcer refer to Alcindor and other Black players as ‘the big boy’ or ‘boy’ feels cringe-worthy in hindsight. It’s a stark reminder of how far we’ve come, but also how much work remains.
This game isn’t just a piece of sports history—it’s a snapshot of a society in transition. UCLA’s victory marked the beginning of a dynasty, but it also highlighted the complexities of race, power, and influence in college sports. What’s your take on this era? Do you think Wooden’s legacy is tarnished by his association with Gilbert, or does his on-court impact outweigh the controversies? Let’s discuss in the comments!
For more insights and discussions, check out the DBR Boards at https://forums.dukebasketballreport.com/. Drop us a line and join the conversation!
